Poalei Zion - England
The Labor Movement - England
The United Workers Party - England
Appellant No. 1
The Organization of General Zionists in England
Herut- in England
Mizrachi and Hapoel Mizrahi - in England
Appellant No. 2
- Against -
The Area Election Committee in England
Respondent No. 1
The Jerusalem Central Election Committee
Respondent No. 2
Attorney T. Klementinovsky, attorney for the The World Zionist Organization
Mapam and the Student Union in England
Respondent No. 3
The petitioners made substantive and formal claims regarding the electoral system in England.
The substantive claim mainly referred to the degree of democracy of the chosen method.
The Herut-Hatzoar alliance in the United States
Americans for progressive Israel
Shomer HaTzair
- Against -
The National Election Committee in the United States
The Central Election Committee
The disputed election method established in the USA towards the XXVIII Zionist Congress determined that 45% be allocated in accordance with the membership of the
constituent organizations that make up the Zionist Federation of the USA, and remaining 55% be allocated directly as a result of a nationwide ballot.
Appeals of this election system were rejected both by the national (area) election committee (AEC) in the USA and by the central election committee.
The court accepted the appeals.
- Against -
The Committee for Determining the Number of Mandates to the XXVIIII Zionist Congress
Five countries requested to increase the number of mandates determined by the mandates committee.
The court decided to cancel the appeal from Belgium, reject the appeal from Mexico, and accept the appeals from Germany, Australia and South Africa, so that the number of delegates to the XXVIIII Zionist Congress from Germany will be 3, from Australia 9 and from South Africa 14.
