The biographical information is based on the website of Judiciary and is published with its authorization.
The Joint Faction (Arzenu, Machane HaTzioni, Meretz, Hanoar HaTzioni Movement)
Merkaz Olami
Yesh Atid Olami
Doron Argov, Chairman of the Standing Committee on Budget and Finance of the World Zionist Organization
- against -
Avraham Duvdevani, Chairman of the Zionist Executive of the World Zionist Organization
The Zionist Executive of the World Zionist Organization
Substantiation for the decision of September 12, 2016: The petition was rejected on the grounds that the processes were normal.
Approval of some of the delegations to the Zionist Congress; and requirement for completion and/or correction regarding the lists from other areas of election.
Arzenu France
- against -
The appeal was erased after the Zionist Federation in France accepted the Arzenu movement as a member.
And the global Likud movement in France gave up a mandate in favor of the Arzenu movement.
Meser - The Renewing Zionist Movement (Tnua Tzionit Hamechadeshet)
- Against -
The Zionist Federation in Argentina
The Area Elections Committee
The election procedure for the Congress was not implemented in Argentina.
The court distributes the mandates in the framework of the judgement.
Over the Rainbow - the Zionist Movement
- against -
The Zionist Federation of Switzerland
The plaintiff withdrew the appeal.
Over the Rainbow - the Zionist movement
- against -
The Zionist Federation of the Netherlands
In light of the annulment of previous elections held in the Netherlands by the court, the court decided that the federation will not have delegates in the Zionist Congress, but will have five representatives in an advisory opinion, one representative for each member of the federation.
Over The Rainbow - Zionist Movement
- Against -
The Zionist Federation in Italy
The Court states that avoiding the process of holding elections by the Zionist Federation is against the rules.
The Court distributes the mandates of this Zionist Federation.
The Court strongly criticizes the practice of not holding elections in the federations.
- against -
The court rules that out of 6 mandates assigned to the Zionist Federation in Hungary, 4 will be assigned to the "Keset" list, and two additional mandates will be assigned, one to the World Likud and the other to the World Mizrachi.
The World Herut Movement
- Against -
The World Zionist Organization - The Mandates Committee
The court decides to reject the petition
1. The petitioner has no standing to file the appeal
2. The period for filing appeals on the distribution of mandates by the mandates committee has also passed.
- Against -
The Zionist Federation of Germany (ZF)
The Court states that the division of mandates made by the management of the Zionist Federation in Germany is annulled.
The Coutt also determined that the mandates will be distributed to each of the existing bodies, including those who requested to join.
These representatives will have an advisory opinion.
The Court orders that the Zionist Congress put on its agenda the amendment of the constitution and the regulations regarding the period of eligibilty for bodies that wish to join the federations, and the criteria for reviewing the activities of the new organizations that wish to join, to the extent required.
- Against -
The court approves the area election committee's course of action and rejects the appeals.
The Meretz World Alliance
- against =
The Zionist Federation in Ukraine
The Court did not accept the request since it did not find that the deficiencies indicated are substantial and go down to the root of the elections and the principles laid down in their infrastructure, to the point of canceling the elections.
Merkaz Olami
- Against -
The court decides that the request of Merkaz Olami to invalidate the electoral register and postpone the elections in Argentina is within the authority of the Central Elections Committee.
The Zionist Federation in Canada
- against -
the committee to determine the number of mandates in the World Zionist Organization
Clarification of decision dated 6/21/2015.
1. The decision refers exclusively to the situation of reaching an agreement between all the bodies, including the three new bodies that were added to the federation according to the court's decision of 5/21/15. The combination means that the agreement will be reopened in such a way that the mandates will be redistributed taking into account the participation of the three new entities.
2. In the meantime, it was decided by the Canadian Federation to hold indirect elections, and a key was determined by it that is not a key established in accordance with the model regulations for indirect elections which were approved by the Central Election Commission in 1976. In accordance with these model regulations, 25 - 50 members in each body constitute an "elector" One and every 50 additional members gives another "electors" accordingly.
In contrast, according to the method established by the Zionist Federation in Canada, 25 - 1000 members in each body gives one "elector", and every 1000 additional members gives another "electors".
3. The Zionist Federation in Canada will provide an explanation as to why the key was determined as determined by it, deviating from what is stated in the sample regulations, as stated above.
Over the Rainbow - The Zionist Movement
- Against -
The Zionist Federation of Switzerland
The Court states that the claims brought forth by the Zionist Federation of Switzerland are rejected.
The tribunal court that the plaintiff should be accepted as a member of the Zionist Federation in Switzerland.
This case was later discussed in case 2809/2015.
World Likud
- against -
The Zionist Federation of the Netherlands
The court accepts the request and orders the Zionist Federation in the Netherlands to accept the World Likud as a member of the federation.
The Zionist Federation in Panama
- Against -
The Mandates Committee for the Zionist Congress
The request was rejected due to delay.
SIONA
a Zionist association registered in Paris (France) in accordance with the French law of July 1, 1901
- against -
The World Zionist Organization
The Zionist General Council
The Central Elections Committee for to the Zionist Congress
The Area Committee Elections (France) for to the Zionist Congress
The court decides to reject the appeal.
In the matter of
the Zionist Federation in Germany
- against -
the committee to determine the number of delegates in the World Zionist Organization
and in the matter of
Over the Rainbow - the Zionist Movement
- against -
the Zionist Federation in Germany
The court decides to add an additional mandate to the Zionist Federation of Germany.
The court decides that the Zionist movement "Over the Rainbow" meets the requirements to be admitted to the federation.
In case 2507/2015 the issue comes up for discussion again.
1. The Zionist Federation in Russia
2. The Zionist Federation in Ukraine
3. The World Beytinu Faction in the World Zionist Organization
- against -
The Committee for Determining the Number of Mandates in the World Zionist Organization
The court decided to add one more mandate to the Zionist Federation in Russia in addition to the existing 9 mandates, and one more mandate to the Zionist Federation in Ukraine in addition to the existing 6 mandates.
The "Joint Faction" in the World Zionist Organization
- against -
The Chairman of the Zionist Executive
Keren Kayemet Le'Israel
Procedure regarding the determination of eligibility to submit a candidacy to the KKL Board of Directors
The organization of Orthodox communities and synagogues in Israel and the Diaspora
- Against -
Dr. David Breakstone, Vice-Chairman of the World Zionist Organization,
Adv. Doron Tamir, and Dr. Stephan Wallenk, Chairmen of the Standing Committee on Budget and Financial Affairs
The Organization of Orthodox Communities and Synagogues is requesting to receive budgets from the line "Allowance for activities among member organizations of the World Zionist Organization" for the 2011 budget year.
WIZO et al.
- against -
The presidium of the Zionist General Council
The court recommends the parties to settle their differences, through agreed mediation, or through negotiations that will lead to a settlement of the dispute.
Also, the approval of the replacement of a faction called the "Zionist Labor Movement" with the "World Zionist Alliance of Labor".
World Herut Alliance
- against -
The Committee for determining the allocation of mandates
In the appeal, the 'World Herut Alliance' (hereinafter 'Herut') seeks to receive a mandate that was denied to it according to the decision of the committee to determine the mandates that allocated 9 mandates to 9 out of all global alliances in the countries of the FSU (Former Soviet Union), and thus deprived Herut at laeat one mandate that it claims it deserved.
With the allocation of one mandate for World Herut, the applicant withdrew the petition.
1. Pro Zion UK (hereafter 'Arzenu')
by attorney Yaron Shavit and Ms. Dalia Levy.
2. DIALOGE (Zionist Labor Movement England)
by Mr. Henry Smith, through Mr. Roni Giboni and Mr. Michel Halimi (hereafter 'Labor')
- against -
1. Adv. Amos Hausner, Attorney/Legal Advisor, World Zionist Organization
2. The 'Kadima-HaNoar HaZioni' Faction
by Adv. Sahar Pinto through Ms. Zofia Diamant
3. Meretz faction
by Mr. Dror Morag
The applicants appeal against the number of mandates determined by the Central Elections Committee.
The court decides on a distribution that slightly changes the number of mandates for some of the factions.
Mr. Dror Morag, Secretary General of the World Alliance of Meretz
- against -
the Central Elections Committee
the Regional Election Committee - Mexico
and Hanoar HaTzioni - Mexico
The court accepts the appeal
Appeal against the decision of the attorney of the World Zionist Organization regarding the interpretation of the settlement in case 0208/2009: a ruling approving a compromise settlement submitted to the court.
The attorney of the World Zionist Organization, Adv. Amos Hausner
AFRJ-RAJI- 'Beitenu Olami', by Mr. Ariel Nodelman
- against -
the Zionist General Council, by Adv. Fern Braniss
The plaintiffs claim that, this section, which allows a regional election committee to decide by a 75% majority on not holding elections, is contrary to the provisions of the World Zionist Organization constitution and general constitutional principles. The parties reached a compromise settlement that was validated by a judgment, as an interim settlement.
