Part of the biographical information is based on the website of the Judiciary and is published with its authorization
- V. -
by Attorney Yaron Herman and/or Rimon Gan-Ad Mia et al.
of Goldfarb Gross Seligman & Co.
Azrieli Center, Round Tower, Tel Aviv-Yafo, 6701101
Tel: 03-6074444; Fax: 03-6074422
Email: Yaron.herman@goldfarb.com
ZOA, Zionist Organization of America, filed a petition requesting that the process of selecting 11 judges to the Tribunal of the American Zionist Movement held at the Executive Meeting on March 23, 2026 be cancelled, and also to order that the ZOA's candidate, Attorney Lauri Regan, be brought to a vote at the regular meeting for 2027.
The petition was denied.
The Respondent offered the Petitioner a reasonable summary to resolve the dispute and the Petitioner rejected this offer and insisted on holding the hearing. Consequently, the Respondent was forced to incur representation costs. The Respondent's attorney requested that costs be imposed. The Court granted the request.
V.
The Court rejected the request:
The Eretz Hakodesh Movement in the Zionist Congress
by Attorney Eliyahu Kaplan et al.
Plaintiffs
- V. -
Respondents
Submitted a response
Following cases 004/2024 and 009/2024 and the respondents' appeal to the District Court in hearing in Tel Aviv 46340-08-24, the District Court (Honorable Justice Oded Gordon) returned the dispute to the Zionist Supreme Court.
At the hearing held at the Supreme Zionist Court, the Court made a proposal and requested the Zionist General Council's announcement on the matter.
The CEO of the AZM (American Zionist Movement) requests the Court's approval for the appointment of a replacement for a delegate who died suddenly.
The court granted the request.
- V. -
The WZO executive decided to limit the number of reserve delegates authorized to participate in congressional committees. The WZO management also required delegates who wish to participate to pay a fee of $250.
The court ruled that the decision did not contradict a provision of the Constitution and that it was made with authority. The petition is dismissed.
1. Zionist Federation in Uganda
2. Zionist Federation in Austria
3. Zionist Federation in Australia
4. Zionist Federation in Ukraine
5. Zionist Federation in Uruguay
6. Zionist Federation in Azerbaijan
7. Zionist Federation in Italy
8. Zionist Federation in England
9. Zionist Federation in Ecuador
10. Zionist Federation in Argentina
11. Zionist Federation in the United States
12. Zionist Federation in Bulgaria
13. Zionist Federation in Belarus
14. Zionist Federation in Belgium
15. Zionist Federation in Brazil
16. Zionist Federation in Guatemala
17. Zionist Federation in Germany
18. Zionist Federation in Denmark
19. Zionist Federation in South Africa
20. Zionist Federation in India
21. Zionist Federation in the Netherlands
22. Zionist Federation in Hungary
23. Zionist Federation in Venezuela
24. Zionist Federation in Greece
25. Zionist Federation in New Zealand
26. Zionist Federation in Spain
27. Zionist Federation in Serbia
28. Zionist Federation in Panama
29. Zionist Federation in Paraguay
30. Zionist Federation in Peru
31. Zionist Federation in Chile
32. Zionist Federation in France
33. Zionist Federation in Colombia
34. Zionist Federation in Costa Rica
35. Zionist Federation in Kazakhstan
36. Zionist Federation in Canada
37. Zionist Federation in Romania
38. Zionist Federation in Russia
39. Zionist Federation in Sweden
40. Zionist Federation in Switzerland
41. World Zionist Organization (hereinafter: WZO)
The court examined the reports submitted to it by the WZO management.
In all federations, election committees were established to manage the process. In two of them, special election committees were appointed by the Central Elections Committee.
In most federations, a voter register was prepared as required. In those that were not, a request for exception was submitted for reasons presented to the court.
The court granted this time but made it clear that in the future it would not approve such exceptions.
The court found that the results met the requirements for representation for women and young adults.
Therefore, the court approved the results. This is subject to the outcome of a pending petition by the Ugandan Federation regarding the composition of its delegates and the election results.
-V-
In Uganda, one delegate was elected to the Congress, on behalf of the Mercaz Olami Uganda movement. The area election committee requested to appoint an alternate delegate on its own initiative. Mercaz claimed in its petition that this was not within the authority of the Uganda area election committee.
The court accepted the Merkaz claim. Uganda will not be able to submit an alternate delegate.
Kol Israel – Confederation
- V. -
The American Zionist Movement (hereinafter: AZM)
Area Election Committee in the United States
Kol Israel – Confederation requested to add alternate delegates to the list submitted for the Zionist Congress by the American Zionist Movement (AZM). The AZM did not object to the addition of alternate delegates to the list, and in light of this, the Court agreed to their addition.
ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ZOA COALITION
- V. -
World Zionist Organization
The ZOA petitioned against the decision of the Zionist Executive to reduce the number of resolution proposals that can be submitted ahead of the Zionist Congress . The petitioner also requested an extension of the deadline for submitting proposals.
The Court found no reason to interfere with the decision of the WZO and deleted the petition.
File No. 2025/018
V.
File No. 2025/023
Am Yisrael Chai (AYC)
V.
File No. 2025/025
Americans 4 Israel | Slate No. 19
V.
File No. 2025/036
Zionist Organization of America
Appellant
V.
Area Election Committee, USA
Respondent
Right of Appeal
File No. 2025/038
V.
The court adopted the tribunal's position that disqualifying valid votes is a disproportionate sanction and therefore fines and alternative punishments should be sufficient.
United for Israel
-V.-
The United for Israel list in Canada filed a petition against the Zionist Federation and the Area Elections Commission in Canada. The court dismissed the petition out of hand. The court noted that before appealing to it, one must appeal to the Zionist Federation Tribunal in Canada. The tribunal's decision can be appealed to the court if necessary.
-V.-
Herut filed a petition against the decision of the Canada Area Elections Commission. An internal tribunal was established in Canada. The tribunal decided that it had jurisdiction to hear the petition. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition and referred the petitioners to the competent court, the tribunal. The court can serve as an appeal court against the decisions of the tribunal.
- V. -
The designated committee (according to the decision of the Central Elections Committee dated 22.7.2025 ) with the authority of the area election committee of the Federation in France
The Mizrachi movement appealed the decisions of the Central Elections Committee in cases 072/2025; 071/2025.
The Mizrachi movement requests an extension to upload the registration forms of its members so that they can vote in the elections.
The court dismissed the appeal because it did not find in the appellants' claims a reason to interfere with the decision of the Central Election Committee.
-V.-
The Zionist General Council of the World Zionist Organization
By Attorney Amir Leon and/or Maor Harosh et al., Belter, Gut, Aloni & Co. Law Firm
A unanimous verdict regarding the request of the Zionist Federation in Moldova to appear before the Zionist General Council and argue regarding its admission to the World Zionist Organization. The Zionist General Council's attorney announced that she had no objection to the request and that the Zionist Federation in Moldova was invited to the next meeting of the Zionist General Council.
-v-
Mizrahi Belgium claimed that the World Zionist Organization's election regulations contradict the election regulations in Belgium.
The general regulations prevail and although it did not pass the threshold, it claims because it has a surplus agreement with Eretz HaKodesh, they are counted as one list and Mizrahi is entitled to one delegate. In addition, claims were made of irregularities in the election process.
The court rejected all claims. First, it was determined that the agreement between the lists was not legally concluded and has no validity. Second, it was determined that their interpretation of the election regulations is incorrect. In addition, the court rejected the claim of irregularities due to the lack of substantive evidence.
Zionist Federation in Venezuala
-v-
1. Mandates Committee for the 39th Congress
2. Zionist Executive Committee
The Zionist Federation in Venezuela requested that no elections be held and that an additional mandate be assigned to it. The court rejected the request.
The court clarified that there is an orderly procedure for canceling elections in a country in a state of emergency, and since it was not followed, the petition should be dismissed out of hand.
Eretz Hakodesh
-v-
The Area Election Committee in England
The Area Election Committee in England approved an electoral system that limits the number of seats a list can win to five. This is to ensure diversity in the identity of the elected seats. Eretz Hakodesh argued that this de facto nullifies the surplus agreements signed by the lists.
The parties reached an agreement that the limitation will apply from the sixth seat. That is, a list that wins six seats will lose the sixth seat.
However, to the extent that there is a share of votes that represents parts of a seat (between 5-6), this share will go to the list with which it signed a surplus agreement. This is to the extent that this will complete the number of votes needed for the other list for an additional seat.
The agreement was given binding force in the ruling.
Herut Movement France
-V-
Herut France argued that the measures ordered by the Central Election Commission were insufficient to remedy the deficiencies discovered in the conduct of the area election committee in France. The court rejected the claims and ruled that no intervention was required in this case.
Shas Olami
- V. -
Likud Olami
Shas Olami claimed that Likud Olami should pay its debt to it. At the request of the parties, the court postponed the hearing to give the parties time to litigate.
On June 21, 2025, the parties announced that they had reached an agreement.
The court confirmed the agreement in its ruling and congratulated the parties for their willingness to compromise.
The Eretz HaKodesh movement at the Zionist Congress
-V.-
The Eretz HaKodesh movement claimed in its complaint that Dr. Yizhar Hess, the vice chairman of the World Zionist Organization, and his movement financed a negative campaign denouncing the World Zionist Organization, in order to convince the ultra-Orthodox public to refrain from voting in the elections for the 39th Zionist Congress. Eretz HaKodesh demanded the imposition of sanctions for violating Article 49 of the Constitution and Regulation 41 of the Election Regulations.
Yizhar Hess and the other respondents claimed that in the absence of the WZO attorney, there is no authority to file a complaint and the right to dismiss the complaint. The court accepted the defendants' argument, but offered the defendants alternative mechanisms instead of a complaint, a means that requires a serving WZO attorney.
In addition, as a prospective statement, the court recommended that the WZO consider formulating a binding code of ethics for all activists and bodies within the framework of the Congress and the WZO. The court also emphasized the importance of appointing the WZO attorney within the framework of the 39th Congress.
The area election committee in the Netherlands
-v-
Central Elections Committee
At a meeting of the Central Elections Committee, it was agreed that the Likud and Meretz lists would be allowed to participate in the elections. The agreement was given binding force by a committee decision. The regional election committee in the Netherlands then appealed to the court, claiming difficulties in implementing the decision. Consequently, it requested that elections be held without both lists. The request was rejected.
1. Herut Movement - France
By Attorney Adv. Naor Yair Maman
- V. -
1. Area Election Committee of the Zionist Federation France
2. Dr. Robert Zbili - President of the Zionist Federation in France
3. Hamizrachi France
4. Meretz France
5. Masorti Movement France
6. Arteznu France
7. Likud France
8. Avoda France
9. Shas France
10. Eretz Hakodesh France
1. Federation of Zionist Organizations of France
2. Zionist Federation of South Africa
- vs -
Mandates Committee for the 39th Congress
The appeals of the Zionist Federation in France (in part) and the Zionist Federation in South Africa were accepted. The court ordered that each of them be granted a mandate.
Likud Peru
by Adv. Neria Meir
- V. –
Area Elections Committee in Peru
The court decided not to postpone the election date or extend the voter registration deadline.
- V. -
The Court decides to assign the appellant one mandate towards the 39th Zionist Congress, as stated in Rule 2(f), this, on a one-time basis and without deciding on the issue of its recognition as a federation.
- V. -
The Zionist Supreme Court thought that a sufficient factual foundation had not been laid before the Zionist General Council in the case of the Latvian community seeking recognition as a federation. In addition, the Court thought that this was a glorious community of centuries, which has seen itself as part of the Zionist enterprise since the beginning of the twentieth century, went through a difficult period during World War II, is trying to recover and renew itself, and is carrying out Zionist activities. It is doubtful whether this aspect was considered in its full scope by the Zionist General Council.
Therefore, the Court decided that it was appropriate to return the hearing to the Zionist General Council in order to present to it a broad factual picture reflecting the past and present of the Latvian community.
Mark Mordechai Ben Adi (passport number 628208952)
by Attorney Eliyahu Kaplan (M.R. 90630) and/or from its office
- V. -
Zionist Federation in Great Britain
Aid Coalition Slate # 14
- V. -
Area Election Committee USA
Americans 4 Israel slate number 19
- V.-
Petition by Americans4Israel, List No. 19, seeking an urgent hearing on the conduct and decision of the U.S. Election Commission. The primary relief sought is the non-disclosure of the election results until the final determination of the petition.
The Court struck out the petition.
- V. -
The Court dismissed the petition against AYC . The lists in the US may file an appeal with the Zionist Court in the US or an additional complaint based on new evidence.
The Court orders the dismissal of the petition against the "Eretz Hakodesh" list.
The Court dismissed the petition against the "Ash Ha'am" list- Respondent 2. If a complaint is filed, the appropriate place to hear it is the Area Elections Committee. An appeal must be filed with the Regional Zionist Court.
- VS. -
Zionist Federation in Italy
On July 2, 2023, in ruling 0002/2023 the Court determined that Arzenu Italy is entitled to join the Zionist Federation of Italy subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions.
On February 28, 2025, the Respondent announced that it had reached a general decision to accept Arzenu Italy as a member of the Federation. Therefore, and in accordance with the agreement of the parties, the Court determined that our country Italy is a member of the Federation for all intents and purposes. This includes attendance at the election committee meeting that will be held in the near future.
If the ruling is not respected and Arzenu Italy does not receive its rights as an equal member of the Federation, the Court will consider taking measures against the Federation, according to Rule 50 of the Court's Regulations (Case 0012/2024 Herut Movement v. Zionist Federation in France).
-Against-
The parties accepted the Court's proposal and announced their agreement as follows :
Ruling in case 0004/2023
- Against -
Link to case 0005/2023 - a case in which this issue is discussed. The hearing in case 0012/2024 is based on the decision made in case 0005/2023.
The Court decided to disqualify the Chairman of the Zionist Federation in France if he does not comply with the terms of the ruling.
The Court will also consider suspending the activities of the Regional Election Committee of France if it does not comply with the ruling.
The Zionist Federation of the Gulf States
- Against -
The Extended Executive of the World Zionist Organization
The Zionist Court decided to return the discussion to the extended executive of the WZO, pointing out to documents and evidence that were not presented to the Court by both sides prior to current hearing .
ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA (ZOA)
- Against -
World Zionist Organization
Ahead of the elections to the XXXIX Zionist Congress, a request was submitted to abolish quotas for women and young adults as required in the constitution of the World Zionist Organization.
The court rejected the request.
- Versus -
Eretz Hakodesh Movement
The request was rejected by majority decision.
THE COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR THE JEWISH HOMELAND / ERETZ HAKODESH, AMIT, RELIGIOUS ZIONISTS OF AMERICA, ZOA COALITION, SHAS OLAMI, HERUT ZIONISTS, VISION, and AMERICANS4ISRAEL
appellants
Affiliates to the appeal
- Versus -
United States Area Election Committee
Respondent
The court discussed the paths open to the appellants according to the type of relief requested:
The court specifies the paths and decides to transfer the case to the Central Election Committee.
The Eretz Hakodesh Movement in the Zionist Congress
Plaintiffs
- Against -
Respondents
Submitted a response
Following decisions made at the Zionist General Council 38/4 held in February 2024, a request was submitted to cancel some of the decisions.
These are decisions regarding changes to the WZO Constitution and bylaws.
The court ruled to accept the petition in the part that refers to the registration of individual Zionists through the offices of the World Zionist Organization in Jerusalem.
The court also decided that the other articles of the constitution and bylaws that were the subject of the petition will remain as amended during the ZGC session.
- Against -
The court decided to reject the requests to stop the voting process or to ban the counting of votes.
- Against -
The court rejects the request of the applicants; because granting the right to present a reservation on each proposed resolution to amend the constitution, given a large number of proposed resolutions, would burden the conduct of the plenary session.
The Eretz Hakodesh Movement at the Zionist Congress
- Against-
The ruling states:
In light of Article 64 of the Constitution, any vote on proposals for Constitutional amendments will be made during the session of the Zionist General Council exclusively in a physical and face-to-face manner.
It is not possible to make a decision on a change in the Constitution based on an online vote, nor through a virtual extension of the session of the Zionist General Council.
Therefore, the petition must be accepted.
The World Herut movement
The Herut movement - France
- against -
Zionist Federation in France
Dr. Robert Zbili- President of the Zionist Federation in France
The court determines that the Herut-France movement is a member of the Zionist Federation in France, and the respondents are obliged to act accordingly.
Publication of the statutes of the Zionist Federation in France: The Department for Irgoon and Connection with Israelis Abroad in the World Zionist Organization must ensure orderly management in the Federation.
-Against -
The Court granted the parties two additional months to make the necessary arrangements to accept Merkaz Spain as a member of the Spanish Zionist Federation.
The World Zionist Organization - Department of Organization and Liaison with Israelis in the Diaspora, should be expected to assist in carrying out the act of expanding participation in a local Zionist organization.
If this is not done within two months from today, the petitioners may apply to the Court to receive a ruling declaring Merkaz Spain a member of the Federation.
This issue was discussed again in case 0002/2025.
The world union of Arzenu in the Zionist Congress
Arzenu Italy
- against -
the Zionist Federation in Italy
Zionist Executive of the World Zionist Organization
The court decides that Arzenu will be admitted to the federation after fulfilling a number of conditions as agreed between the parties.
ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA (ZOA)/ZOA Coalition
COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR THE JEWISH HOMELAND (CCJH)
SHAS USA
- against -
the World Zionist Organization
The court did not accept the petitioners' arguments and rejected the request.
The court also stated that the Zionist Organization must establish rules and instructions governing online voting in the event that it becomes necessary in the future.
Roy Schindler, member of the Zionist Executive of the World Zionist Organization
- against -
Yaakov Hagoel, chairman of the Executive of the World Zionist Organization,
the World Zionist Organization,
Brit Etz faction (World Zionist Labour),
Silvio Hoskowitz, member of the Zionist Executive of the World Zionist Organization and head of the department of Zionist Enterprises
An issue in the financing of world unions and the number of members of the Zionist Executive who need to sign the application submitted to the WZO.
Later, the applicant withdrew the appeal - see other decisions in the case.
The Eretz Hakodesh Movement at the World Zionist Congress
The Holy Land Movement England
- against -
The Zionist Federation of England and Ireland
Mr. Richard Wolfe, Chairman of the British Zionist Federation
Mrs. Ruth Neyman, Chairman of the Constitution Committee, The English Zionist Federation
The Zionist Executive of the World Zionist Organization
The court rules that the Zionist Federation of England and Ireland must accept the Holy Land Movement England as a full member.
World Merkaz
Arzenu
World Union of Yesh Atid-Meretz
The World Federation of the Spanish Communities
World Na'amat
The Liberal Center Movement - Hanoar Hatzioni
- Against -
Ms. Helena Glazer - Chairperson of the Presidium of the Zionist General Council
In the Zionist General Council 38/2, the votes on the resolution proposals took place virtually.
The court is required to decide on the issue of publishing how the delegates voted on each one of the resolution proposals.
The World Zionist Union Blue-White Beyond the Rainbow
- Against -
Racheli Baratz - Rix
The Secretariat of the World Zionist Organization
Resilience to Israel Faction in the WZO
Yael Ron Ben Moshe
The petition is dismissed. The court decided that this was not a dispute concerning the World Zionist Organization.
Coordinating Council for the Jewish Homeland
ZOA
- Against -
the Zionist Federation in the USA - AZM
The World Zionist Organization
Ameinu
Association of Reform Zionists of America (ARZA)
Mercaz USA
Partners for Progressive Israel
The reasoning for the ruling stating that the results of the elections in the United States for the Zionist Congress held at the end of October 2020 must be implemented immediately before the institutions of the federation - the board and the assembly - can meet and make decisions.
The board of the AZM will be entitled to return and convene only when the following are added to it:
12 representatives of the Holy Land;
6 representatives of the ZOA;
6 representatives and no more of Merkaz.
Meretz's World Alliance
Department of Diaspora Activities (in charge of elections in federations)
Mr. Jacob Jerassi
- against -
Mr. Victor Melamed
Mr. Simon Sameach
The decision relates to the issues: Which of the 2 respondents was authorized to hold election procedures in Bulgaria; and were there any flaws in the election procedures conducted by each of the two aforementioned respondents separately. The verdict indicates the respondent with the authority, but gives a notice of nullity regarding the election procedure.
The election procedure for the Zionist Congress consists of different stages, a defined schedule, rules and processes as defined in the WZO Constitution and regulations. According to the Constitution, the Zionist Supreme Court checks the accuracy of the procedure in each of the different election areas in the world, and may approve, reject or change the results.
According to the current ruling, three electoral regions were not allowed to send delegates to the Congress: Greece, Guatemala and Sweden. The representatives of other electoral regions were approved.
In this comprehensive ruling, the court expresses its opinion on the election processes in general, points out the weaknesses of some of its stages, the possible deficiencies, and suggests improvements that can optimize one of the important elements of the foundations of the World Zionist Organization: the elections to the Zionist Congress .
The Zionist Organization of America
- Against -
Arza USA
Hatikvah USA
and
The Eretz Hakodesh Organization USA
- Against -
Hatikvah USA
The Area Election Committee, USA
The first appeal of the Zionist Organization of America against Arza USA and Hatikva USA, regarding the unreasoned decision of the Area Election Commission, USA of July 20, 2020.
The second appeal of Eretz Hakidesh USA vs. Hatikvah USA regarding the the unreasoned decision of the Area Election Commission, USA of August 12, 2020.
The subject of the appeals is the requests to disqualify Arza USA and Hitikva USA:
(a) from participating in the Zionist Congress that is to be held in the month of October, this year;
(b) to disqualify certain members of these organizations from participating in that congress;
(c) and to exclude Arza USA and the Hatikvah USA from the Zionist movement.
All this, because they violated and are violating the policy of the World Zionist Organization to act against the boycott organization known as BDS.
The appeals were rejected.
1 . Likud Brazil
2. World Likud
- against -
1. The Zionist Federation in Brazil
2. The Area Election Committee in Brazil
3. The Central Election Committee
4. The World Zionist Organization
The appeal was nullified since the parties submitted a "100 percent agreement".
The Zionist Federation in Venezuela
the Zionist Federation in Ukraine
the Zionist Federation in Brazil
the Zionist Federation in Italy
- against -
the World Zionist Organization
the Mandates Committee for the Zionist Congress
the Zionist Federation in Chile
the Zionist Federation in New Zealand
the Zionist Federation in Germany
According to the ruling, the requests were rejected - the procedure is not based on the law.
This is a recurring request by the Zionist federations to increase the number of mandates assigned to them, and in case 0006/2020 the court had already been required to address the issue and had given a clear decision.
Dr. Tadhar Steiner
Israel Shelanu List in Hungary
- Against -
The Central Election Committee
The World Zionist Organization
The Zionist Federation in Hungary
The Area Election Committee in Hungary
An appeal against the Central Election Committee's decision not to cancel the 100% agreement signed in Hungary.
The decision was mainly based on the delay of the appellants.
The court rejected the appeal.
Over the Rainbow - the Zionist movement
- against -
The Central Election Committee
The World Zionist Organization
The Zionist Federation of France
An appeal of Over the Rainbow is rejected due to the same reasons stated by CEC- delay.
The Zionist Federation in New Zealand
- against -
the Central Election Committee,
the World Zionist Organization
The Zionist Federation in New Zealand asked the Central Election Committee to use its credentials found in Article 27 of the Congressional Election Regulations (hereinafter: "Election Regulations") and to approve an exception or deviation from the provisions of Article 10(c)(1) of the Election Regulations so that instead of 50 supporting signatures it will be necessary to gather 10 signatures only.
The appeal was cancelled according to the appellant's request.
Likud Canada
World Likud
- against -
the Canadian Zionist Federation
Area Elections committee of the Canadian Zionist Federation
The appeal was rejected by the majority opinion: See the judges' reasonings for rejecting the applicants' appeal as well as a minority opinion for accepting the appeal
The Zionist Federation in Venezuela
The Zionist Federation in Ukraine
The Zionist Federation in Australia
The Zionist Federation in New Zealand
The Zionist Federation in Mexico
The Zionist Federation in Canada
The Zionist Federation in Belgium
The Zionist Federation in Germany
- Against -
the Mandates Committee for the 38th Zionist Congress
In the ruling, the court gives reasonings for rejecting the requests for the addition of the contested mandates.
The Mizrahi Movement
Lavi Olami
- Against -
the Central Election Committee
AZM Area Election Committee
(respondents)
Zionist Organization of America (ZOA)
"ARZA" the reform Zionist organization in the USA
"Hatikva" - a list that is running in the congressional elections representing "Ameinu" and PPI
World Likud movement (applicants to affiliate to the case)
An appeal against the Central Elections Committee decision to allow the operation of the website in the USA for the purpose of voting in the elections.
The appeal was rejected: case 0210.2015 cited as a precedent.
The Organization of Orthodox Communities and Synagogues in Israel and the Diaspora
Eliezer Shafer - Chairman of the organization and its representative in the Executive of the World Zionist Organization
David Ben Nae - Member of the Standing Committee on Budget and Counter Finances
- against -
Mr. Avraham Duvdevani - Chairman of the Executive of the World Zionist Organization
The Zionist Executive of the World Zionist Organization
The Presidium of the Zionist General Council
The Standing Committee on the Budget and Finances
Chairperson of WIZO Olami, Mrs. Helena Glazer,
Chairperson of Maccabi Olami, Mr. David Kornfeld
Bnei Brit, Alan Schneider
Chairperson of Naamat Olami, Mrs. Masha Lubelski
Chairperson of Emuna Olami, Ms. Dina Hahn
(formal respondents)
The Court instructs the parties to submit documents for today's hearing
