Part of the biographical information is based on Wikipedia entries and is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
The Attorney of the Zionist Organization
- Against -
-------
"Arza"
and the World Union of Progressive Jewry
- Against -
4. The Likud Faction
5. The Confederation
6. And the Mizrachi - Hapoel Mizrachi
The judgment and substantiation mainly refers to the issue of whether the Presidium of the Zionist General Council had the authority to order the holding of a written referendum among the members of the Zionist General Council regarding the elections in the USA.
The appeals were rejected.
The Herut-Hatzoar alliance in the United States
Americans for progressive Israel
Shomer HaTzair
- Against -
The National Election Committee in the United States
The Central Election Committee
The disputed election method established in the USA towards the XXVIII Zionist Congress determined that 45% be allocated in accordance with the membership of the
constituent organizations that make up the Zionist Federation of the USA, and remaining 55% be allocated directly as a result of a nationwide ballot.
Appeals of this election system were rejected both by the national (area) election committee (AEC) in the USA and by the central election committee.
The court accepted the appeals.
The attorney of the World Zionist Organization appealed to the court to review the legality of the decision of the Zionist General Council.
The Congress Court decides to cancel the decision of the Zionist General Council of July 14, 1976, to add paragraphs b) to e) to Regulation 20 of the election regulations for the Zionist Congress, because it violates In articles 19, paragraphs 1 and 22 of the constitution of the World Zionist Organization.
